Some of you have written to me in support of my post re "the sacred origins of our dance" on the Indigo tribe. Thankyou.

It seems one individual has taken it very personally and insisted that my writing (and thus by extrapolation me - Palika - have dared to define the world of archaology and anthropology. I certainly didn't write anywhere about defining or containing or even insulting (oh no don't do that) the hallow ground of anthropology, archaeology or early human history and evolution. Nope I wrote a narrative taken from my many years of historical, anthropological, archaeological and yes anecdotal reading of research and theorizing on the subject of a personal interest - that of the origins and existence and practice of Goddess, matrilineal social organization and existence and exploring theories of how real life events create meaningful and ritualized dance for humans.

Fact is I choose what inferences and hypothesis to believe from what research I've read because it makes sense to me. And......

the voice there claiming to be the protector and herald of archaeology is hardly the end all be all voice of anthropology and archaeology and certainly not of the topic I'm interested in. There is much research and plenty agreement among many (no I'm not claiming all) prominent scholars of those fields on the origins of Goddess, matrilineal social organization and the origins of sacred dance. All one has to do is look and read. I suggest people do their own research. I don't know why, but she seems to be very personally triggered by what I wrote, but it doesn't really change anything, there may be folks with PHD's who agree or not, but plenty, plenty has been written and explored on these topics and anyone with some good library skills can find it and read it for themselves. I was just summarizing and infusing my own storytelling visions with what I've discovered in that body of literature and sharing my POV on how it may relate to current inspirations and practices of Belly Dance.

Because I had recieved so much personal email appreciating the original post on tribal belly dance tribe, and my own tribe here, I decided to post the essay on the Indigo tribe, a community I don't know as well and rarely post on. And yes that may have been my hubris acting. I do post alot of original writing on tribe in general, using it as a reflection pool and interfacing with women (and some men) about issues that are meaningful to me and perhaps to them in their personal life of self realization and personal transformation - two practices that interest me greatly. Those that know me, know that my interest is in service, humility, learning to embrace all feeling states in equanimity and developing empathy, gratitude and joy in prayer and mind states as well as in a daily practice of living. I'm an avid reader, writer and sitter as well as dancer and beekeeper. And I can be motivated by my own ego as well as by mindful awareness in my writing practice and explorations. The post was intended to be inspirational and came from a deeply personal reference point. It seemed to push out of me to be shared.

And... whenever you stir the pot, bubbles rise to the top.

So when the posts on Indigo started getting heated, I breathed alot, did some sitting and responded with open heart only to recieve even more irritation in response. Truth is, this is life. There is no guarantee that one can dissipate anger, hostility, or personal soapboxes by any personal practice. But in fact we do the practice of humillity, stepping back and slowing down because it is the life of peace and mindfulness that we cultivate and because its OUR OWN HEART we want and intend to transform. What reactions happen around us may or may not be what we hope for and interdependent understandings may not be reached.. We can do one of two things, we can retreat and continue our practice carefully dusting, brushing, transforming, rearranging, cleaning out, creating anew and then come back into contact or not with the previous stimulating situation, person or issue, - or we can continue to defend due to ego clinging to author an alternate outcome. Either way no judgement, but a call to deeper self reflection is the main thing for me and the path I choose at this moment.

In my passion I may have made statements that sounded like all encompassing assumptions of Truth. And thanks to the responses I recieved I can pursue more thoughtful and careful writing as well as pursue the experience of writing something controversial and then learning to truly be with the "hot" responses it evokes. Both insights are there for me and I'm grateful for them and those that helped generate those insights are my teachers so I give them thanks and send them well wishes for freedom from suffering and the experience of deep and authentic happiness and rightful situatedness in this life.

As for the hallowed halls of archaeology, anthropology, history and human exploration etc, they are full of both suffocating hubris and expository paradigmatic mindopening explosions. I hope to contribute to the latter in my small little way for my benefit and others.

Blessings and gratitude, Palika

posted by:
palika
SF Bay Area
  • on the note about anthropology:

    i just finished reading Russell Means' autobiography (Where White Men Fear to Tread), and he complains about white anthropologists. in one chapter, a woman anthro who came to observe his camp in the Black Hills completely misread what he was doing and accused him of using his knife, which he used to dig a small hole and bury an offering in the ground each morning, as a 'symbolic phallus' to 'rape mother earth,' and that his people oppressed their women. he told her to get out, but it was also a funny scene in the book.

    just 'cause it's science doesn't mean some people in the field can't be wrong.

    i also read 'the soul of the indian,' which is an old book about native american spirituality. women's roles are described as being different from men's--but not subservient.
    • You win the "get Palika to laugh award". I don't laugh nearly enuf and now you've gone and done it twice in one day. That book is on my reading list thanks for the reminder. To really start to get into knowledge in a big way about anything, I believe one really needs to have a working understanding of the many isms - definitely the big ones, sexism, racism, classicism and materialism, but all the other "assumed" and not transparent prejudices at work in really insidious ways in our body, minds and hearts.

      Learning and gaining awareness of self, other and whats in between is a lifelong endeavor and in my humble opinion one of the most life worthy projects.
      • I have a hard time giving credibility to people who are mean. I need to work on this because there have been many times in my life I've encountered negativity and reacted to it, making a judgment on the person over really listening to what is being said. All in all, I think that's the lesson I got from the discussion on the Indigo, which is kind of strange considering the content had nothing to do with this. Thanks for being so gracious in the face of hostile confrontation. I hope to cultivate this quality some day.
        jul
        p.s. Maybe we should invite her to Santa Cruz for a potluck and drum circle? Must be cold in the UK and here, well, we are warm.
        • May I just say that your grace, Palika, did not go unnoticed. I am saddened to see such toxicity comming from the person who so strongly took issue with your posts on the Indigo and I applaud you your continued loving kindness as well as your non-accepance (okay, so I know that isn't really a word) of her hostility/rudness. She certainly did seem to have taken personal offense to your postings. You are an eloquent and gifted writer and what you had to say in addition to what you've said here touched chords in many hearts. I personally put great weight in the concepts of "history is written by the Winners/Opressors", cellular memory, and intuition, as well as teh "conventional" paths to knowledge. So, I applaud you adn learn from your loving-kindness in the face of adversity.

          Blessings,
          Natalia
  • Palika, I really hope I get to meet you in person one day. You have such a wonderful approach to thought and expression. I have a sincere appreciation for the grace with which you defended your point of view. I'll have to go check out the thread now and see what all the stink was about.

    Good for you for stirring the kettle!
    • I found the thread digressed into a very weird thing so I have to admit that I stopped reading it. I found that your responses were very gracious and well thought out and that some folks were just reading things into it that weren't intentionally there. Everyone comes from a different place and that colors what they read and how they experience things. The fact that you are willing to step back and learn from this experience shows a depth of understanding that is wonderful. I do not always agree with everything that is said but I always try and be open minded enough to allow the information to flow through me. It is only by being open that we are able to learn and grow.

      I hope this does not stop you from sharing your writing, I have been very inspired by much of it.

      Blessings,

      Dian
  • Good Goddess! I just read that thread for the first time and was utterly shocked at the rudeness and arrogance. Palika, I just have to say that you handled it with utmost grace and mindfulness. Let's pray that that woman will one day melt the chip off her shoulder. There are ways to graciously disagree, and she unfortunately has some serious work to do in that department (we all have work, I know). I just wanted to say kudos to you for staying mindful despite such undeserved hostility!
    Blessings,
    Aimee
  • Palika, I concluded quite simply that the person in question is actually JEALOUS. Your accomplishments in bellydance speak for theirselves. I've seen that person all over the bellydance tribes and now they are the freaking expert on the archaeology of bellydance... you may not be competitive with her in her world, but she sure cannot compete with you in yours and I think that makes you the winner. And in her mind thats the worst part of it. She so wants to be a part of this world, but clearly her need to dominate extends to this venue, and since she cannot dominate and win in a dancing/teaching context she is very irritated.
  • I know this is a somewhat belated addition, but as both a bellydancer AND an archaeology student, I've got to ask... please don't generalize us, just as you wouldn't want to be generalized. I deal with the "suffocating hubris" of some teachers/peers, but I've met more wonderful and tolerant people in this line than in many, many other places.

    Sometimes a knife in the dirt is just a knife in the dirt. A lot of us in the field tend towards the thought that you shouldn't interfere with people's culture just because you don't understand it - in fact, that's the rule, and NOT the exception. Those who do otherwise are really breaking a huge part of protocol. People will believe and do what they want to believe and do. It's the anthropologist's job to UNDERSTAND it, not to CHANGE it.

    So... ahem. That helped my wounded academic pride a bit. Sorry to butt in, thank you and goodnight.
  • It seems to me that where the digression began was with the inevitable question "but what about the men?" This seems to arise whenever someone, as Palika has done, taken a gynocentric perspective. Even simply speaking of woman, women or using the pronoun "she" in a general context, rather than using generic terms (whether "man," "he," or using ungendered terms like "human") one is sometimes immediately accused of excluding or even hating men. But this is not the case: it is simply giving prominance to female experience or expression (which belly dance originally is and is predominantly even though there certainly is a long history of men practicing the art as well) for a change.

    Of course men have danced, even belly danced. But Palika was focusing instead on women's dance and history of that dance. And of course there are both women and men who will take exception to that focus. Which is unfortunate as it is not *against* anyone... but *for* women.
    • i've had similar reactions when i post gynocentric sentiments about bellydance--even when i take care to add that i'm all for men bellydancing and enjoy watching them do so.

      we have more work to do in order to get true equality and understanding, but many people seem to want to stop right where we are. not sure what that's all about! i'm not comfortable yet--when looking at my paycheck, walking alone on the street, or watching what's happening with basic rights.